<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Voting Truth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://votingtruth.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://votingtruth.com</link>
	<description>Your source for truth in voting.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:40:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama style Halloween by Adrienne Randall</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/obama-halloween/obama-style-halloween/comment-page-1/#comment-16578</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrienne Randall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=118#comment-16578</guid>
		<description>I have a child who is hoping to one day have over 100 pieces of candy. Does that mean that you will give him less?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a child who is hoping to one day have over 100 pieces of candy. Does that mean that you will give him less?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Practical Application of Redistribution of Wealth by tyleram</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/redistribution-of-wealth/practical-application-of-redistribution-of-wealth/comment-page-1/#comment-9524</link>
		<dc:creator>tyleram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=105#comment-9524</guid>
		<description>I found some interesting numbers at the tax foundation.org.  The bottom 50% of income earners only pay 2.89% of the total tax burden.  The effective tax rate is approximately 3%.  Judging from your pathetic tip, I&#039;ll assume you are in the bottom 50%

of that $10, your tax burden would be $3. (your server, since that $10 was most likely after tax income for you)  According to your chart,  

SS: $.63, Nat. defense: $.57, medicare: $.42, income security: $.39,
health: $.30, interest: $.27, education and social services: $.09, transportation: $.09, vet benefits: $.09, other: $.15.  

Considering this person is homeless, I&#039;m not exactly sure what government money he is getting anyway.  It was your $10, and you made a choice.  I guess he got $10.09 total ($.09 social services and $10 from you?) Maybe health, and definitely nat. defense, too.

Furthermore, your $10 was after taxes.  Your server incurred a tax burden of 8% of your bill, whether he actually got 8% or not.  So, his tax contribution to the homeless man may actually be more than the $3.  Whether you gave it to the server or homeless man, the server was responsible for taxed income for YOUR lunch. He&#039;s not the one bitching about taxes. Maybe he thinks 3% is fair.  And maybe he gives him $1 everyday.

What makes you think $10 is what the service you received at lunch was worth anyway? That&#039;s what it was worth to you.  15% is an arbitrary number based on the 8% of sales.  It is worth (could be) something else to your server, his employer, and other diners.  

Would you prefer going home and preparing the same meal for yourself? For most people that work, that is an impossibility.  So I think that I can argue that his job makes your job possible, and vice versa.  I think that is also a pretty good argument for wealth redistribution.  Unless of course you would REALLY rather be self-sufficient and join the amish Community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found some interesting numbers at the tax foundation.org.  The bottom 50% of income earners only pay 2.89% of the total tax burden.  The effective tax rate is approximately 3%.  Judging from your pathetic tip, I&#8217;ll assume you are in the bottom 50%</p>
<p>of that $10, your tax burden would be $3. (your server, since that $10 was most likely after tax income for you)  According to your chart,  </p>
<p>SS: $.63, Nat. defense: $.57, medicare: $.42, income security: $.39,<br />
health: $.30, interest: $.27, education and social services: $.09, transportation: $.09, vet benefits: $.09, other: $.15.  </p>
<p>Considering this person is homeless, I&#8217;m not exactly sure what government money he is getting anyway.  It was your $10, and you made a choice.  I guess he got $10.09 total ($.09 social services and $10 from you?) Maybe health, and definitely nat. defense, too.</p>
<p>Furthermore, your $10 was after taxes.  Your server incurred a tax burden of 8% of your bill, whether he actually got 8% or not.  So, his tax contribution to the homeless man may actually be more than the $3.  Whether you gave it to the server or homeless man, the server was responsible for taxed income for YOUR lunch. He&#8217;s not the one bitching about taxes. Maybe he thinks 3% is fair.  And maybe he gives him $1 everyday.</p>
<p>What makes you think $10 is what the service you received at lunch was worth anyway? That&#8217;s what it was worth to you.  15% is an arbitrary number based on the 8% of sales.  It is worth (could be) something else to your server, his employer, and other diners.  </p>
<p>Would you prefer going home and preparing the same meal for yourself? For most people that work, that is an impossibility.  So I think that I can argue that his job makes your job possible, and vice versa.  I think that is also a pretty good argument for wealth redistribution.  Unless of course you would REALLY rather be self-sufficient and join the amish Community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Infomercial by Charlotte Dyess</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/obama-infomercial/obama-infomercial/comment-page-1/#comment-2807</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlotte Dyess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=124#comment-2807</guid>
		<description>President Obama is a wonderful speaker!  Now he needs to &quot;prove&quot; what the costs will be...show where and how much the savings will come from. Real dollar amounts, details, not just promises.  I think there should be more of his working with Republicans not just now is the time,etc....Give us facts and details, not just promises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is a wonderful speaker!  Now he needs to &#8220;prove&#8221; what the costs will be&#8230;show where and how much the savings will come from. Real dollar amounts, details, not just promises.  I think there should be more of his working with Republicans not just now is the time,etc&#8230;.Give us facts and details, not just promises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Barack Obama has been elected President by DHS</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/mike-huckabee/barack-obama-has-been-elected-president/comment-page-1/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>DHS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=168#comment-272</guid>
		<description>One nonsensical quote from an item above stated: &quot;There are small businesses barely scraping by that make much more than $250,000/yr.&quot; Well, I own a small business and we&#039;d be very lucky indeed to make as much as $100,000 yr, let alone $250K. &quot;Scraping by&quot;? Give me a break. Also, you incorrectly insinuated that $250,000 is the threshold amount for the higher federal tax bill for a &quot;small business.&quot; To be correct, you should have said &quot;person,&quot; as an individual who makes over $250K would get the higher bill and not a small business per se. If you&#039;re gonna criticize, at least get it right! By the way, the higher tax bill is only as high as the rates were under Pres. Reagan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One nonsensical quote from an item above stated: &#8220;There are small businesses barely scraping by that make much more than $250,000/yr.&#8221; Well, I own a small business and we&#8217;d be very lucky indeed to make as much as $100,000 yr, let alone $250K. &#8220;Scraping by&#8221;? Give me a break. Also, you incorrectly insinuated that $250,000 is the threshold amount for the higher federal tax bill for a &#8220;small business.&#8221; To be correct, you should have said &#8220;person,&#8221; as an individual who makes over $250K would get the higher bill and not a small business per se. If you&#8217;re gonna criticize, at least get it right! By the way, the higher tax bill is only as high as the rates were under Pres. Reagan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Barack Obama has been elected President by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/mike-huckabee/barack-obama-has-been-elected-president/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Yu-Jen Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 05:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=168#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Barack Obama:

Barack Obama is a racial-minority individual, and in his heart and mind he inevitably does not endorse hate crimes committed by George W. Bush.

George W. Bush committed hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism (indicated in my blog).

George W. Bush did in fact commit innumerable hate crimes.

And I do solemnly swear by Almighty God that George W. Bush committed other hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism which I am not at liberty to mention.

Many people know what Bush did.

And many people will know what Bush did—even to the end of the world.

Bush was absolute evil.

Bush is now like a fugitive from justice.

Bush is a psychological prisoner.

Bush has a lot to worry about.

Bush can technically be prosecuted for hate crimes at any time.

In any case, Bush will go down in history in infamy.

Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang
B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
Messiah College, Grantham, PA
Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993
 
“GEORGE W. BUSH IS THE WORST PRESIDENT IN U.S. HISTORY” BLOG OF ANDREW YU-JEN WANG
______________________
I am not sure where I had read it before, but anyway, it is a linguistically excellent statement, and it goes kind of like this: “If only it were possible to ban invention that bottled up memories so they never got stale and faded.” Oh wait—off the top of my head—I think the quotation came from my Lower Merion High School yearbook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Barack Obama:</p>
<p>Barack Obama is a racial-minority individual, and in his heart and mind he inevitably does not endorse hate crimes committed by George W. Bush.</p>
<p>George W. Bush committed hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism (indicated in my blog).</p>
<p>George W. Bush did in fact commit innumerable hate crimes.</p>
<p>And I do solemnly swear by Almighty God that George W. Bush committed other hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism which I am not at liberty to mention.</p>
<p>Many people know what Bush did.</p>
<p>And many people will know what Bush did—even to the end of the world.</p>
<p>Bush was absolute evil.</p>
<p>Bush is now like a fugitive from justice.</p>
<p>Bush is a psychological prisoner.</p>
<p>Bush has a lot to worry about.</p>
<p>Bush can technically be prosecuted for hate crimes at any time.</p>
<p>In any case, Bush will go down in history in infamy.</p>
<p>Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang<br />
B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996<br />
Messiah College, Grantham, PA<br />
Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993</p>
<p>“GEORGE W. BUSH IS THE WORST PRESIDENT IN U.S. HISTORY” BLOG OF ANDREW YU-JEN WANG<br />
______________________<br />
I am not sure where I had read it before, but anyway, it is a linguistically excellent statement, and it goes kind of like this: “If only it were possible to ban invention that bottled up memories so they never got stale and faded.” Oh wait—off the top of my head—I think the quotation came from my Lower Merion High School yearbook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Barack Obama has been elected President by Steve</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/mike-huckabee/barack-obama-has-been-elected-president/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 13:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=168#comment-116</guid>
		<description>You made that comment on a post that is pro-Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You made that comment on a post that is pro-Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Long Do We Have? by What Lies Ahead? &#124; booshink</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/redistribution-of-wealth/how-long-do-we-have/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>What Lies Ahead? &#124; booshink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=163#comment-113</guid>
		<description>[...] for our country. I hope for the best but sometimes expect the worst. Read this cautionary article, How Long Do We Have? and see what you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for our country. I hope for the best but sometimes expect the worst. Read this cautionary article, How Long Do We Have? and see what you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Long Do We Have? by Rob Murphy</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/redistribution-of-wealth/how-long-do-we-have/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=163#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Is this all there is to the article?  Who wrote this?

Also, I&#039;m looking for a source that records socialist quotes. such as Obama&#039;s &quot;spread the wealth around&quot; comment, Hillary&#039;s &quot;we will have to take you over for the greater good&quot; comment (not exact) regarding the oil companies earlier in the year or Bill&#039;s comment back in the 90s when he was discussing giving tax breaks to the elderly and said &quot;I can&#039;t do that because I don&#039;t think you would spend the money wisely&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this all there is to the article?  Who wrote this?</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m looking for a source that records socialist quotes. such as Obama&#8217;s &#8220;spread the wealth around&#8221; comment, Hillary&#8217;s &#8220;we will have to take you over for the greater good&#8221; comment (not exact) regarding the oil companies earlier in the year or Bill&#8217;s comment back in the 90s when he was discussing giving tax breaks to the elderly and said &#8220;I can&#8217;t do that because I don&#8217;t think you would spend the money wisely&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Barack Obama has been elected President by Mark</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/mike-huckabee/barack-obama-has-been-elected-president/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=168#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I&#039;m just thinking you should probably change the name of this site... Not because there isn&#039;t some truth to the things you say, but because your opinion is very one-sided. This is basically just another anti-Obama site and not really a source for truth in voting. A true soure for truth would show the truth about both sides of the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just thinking you should probably change the name of this site&#8230; Not because there isn&#8217;t some truth to the things you say, but because your opinion is very one-sided. This is basically just another anti-Obama site and not really a source for truth in voting. A true soure for truth would show the truth about both sides of the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Barack Obama has been elected President by Erik</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/mike-huckabee/barack-obama-has-been-elected-president/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=168#comment-16</guid>
		<description>http://www.truthforlifeforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&amp;t=11</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.truthforlifeforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&amp;t=11" rel="nofollow">http://www.truthforlifeforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&amp;t=11</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Selfishness by Sandu</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/taxes/selfishness/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=141#comment-13</guid>
		<description>They are called scholarships and please post your the proof you have that Obama never worked. And please get your information straight about the GOP tax cuts that have only gone to the most wealthy corporations. If you had any logical sense at all you would see that GOP tax cuts every time they talk about giving one have only increased the wealth of the already wealthy, while the middle class has been steadily shrinking over the past 20 years. That is redistribution of wealth so who are the real socialists in the US? The GOP. As for lazy people you are so out of touch with the people who do the most menial labor in this country and thanks to GOP tax cuts pay a much higher rate that someone who makes 250,000.00 a year. By the way the Joe the Plumber thing was another piece of misleading conservative media designed to scare small business owners about the tax plan the President elect has. 

I believe most small business owners will be getting far more money back than they ever had under GOP tax plans. The other point is President elect Barrack wasn&#039;t referring to the taxing of the gross profits of a business but the actual income the owner paid himself with. Therefor a business making 250,000 will not see a tax raise as the owner of that business has all his business expenses which of course will put his take home pay far below a quarter million. 

The people who are completely out of touch with American workers are the GOP. Reagan&#039;s tax breaks for the wealthy in the 80&#039;s along with his trickle down economic voodoo is what put all tax increases on working and midddle class Americans and of course he was another large spending President just like the current outgoing coup.

No wonder the country is in the shape its in when so many people have sucked up the GOP propaganda about redistribution of wealth from the middle class to the poor. If one iota of that had happened the poor would be growing less poor not more so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are called scholarships and please post your the proof you have that Obama never worked. And please get your information straight about the GOP tax cuts that have only gone to the most wealthy corporations. If you had any logical sense at all you would see that GOP tax cuts every time they talk about giving one have only increased the wealth of the already wealthy, while the middle class has been steadily shrinking over the past 20 years. That is redistribution of wealth so who are the real socialists in the US? The GOP. As for lazy people you are so out of touch with the people who do the most menial labor in this country and thanks to GOP tax cuts pay a much higher rate that someone who makes 250,000.00 a year. By the way the Joe the Plumber thing was another piece of misleading conservative media designed to scare small business owners about the tax plan the President elect has. </p>
<p>I believe most small business owners will be getting far more money back than they ever had under GOP tax plans. The other point is President elect Barrack wasn&#8217;t referring to the taxing of the gross profits of a business but the actual income the owner paid himself with. Therefor a business making 250,000 will not see a tax raise as the owner of that business has all his business expenses which of course will put his take home pay far below a quarter million. </p>
<p>The people who are completely out of touch with American workers are the GOP. Reagan&#8217;s tax breaks for the wealthy in the 80&#8242;s along with his trickle down economic voodoo is what put all tax increases on working and midddle class Americans and of course he was another large spending President just like the current outgoing coup.</p>
<p>No wonder the country is in the shape its in when so many people have sucked up the GOP propaganda about redistribution of wealth from the middle class to the poor. If one iota of that had happened the poor would be growing less poor not more so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama&#039;s National Security Force by omg</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/obama/obamas-national-security-force/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>omg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=150#comment-12</guid>
		<description>this man scares me.  i was voting dem this yr, but have changed my mind.  off to vote rep!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this man scares me.  i was voting dem this yr, but have changed my mind.  off to vote rep!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Selfishness by Working Girl</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/taxes/selfishness/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Working Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 03:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=141#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I agree with everything in this article except the last paragraph.  I do not believe that Barack Obama worked hard all his life to become wealthy.  I believe that someone financed his education and groomed him to be where he is today. He didn&#039;t need the US Government to give him handouts - someone else was already doing so. 

He came from a modest family.  How did his family afford to send him to Columbia?  or Harvard?  Is that why his college records are sealed?  Who funded his education?  

How did he &quot;earn&quot; his wealth?  He worked as a community organizer.  Last I checked that is not a high paying job.  Looks suspicious to me.

Mr. Obama has not WORKED for a living and is out of touch with the average American worker.  Wake up America - Barack Obama will do nothing for you except tax the working people to help the lazy folks get their large screen TVs, fancy cars, and houses they can&#039;t afford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with everything in this article except the last paragraph.  I do not believe that Barack Obama worked hard all his life to become wealthy.  I believe that someone financed his education and groomed him to be where he is today. He didn&#8217;t need the US Government to give him handouts &#8211; someone else was already doing so. </p>
<p>He came from a modest family.  How did his family afford to send him to Columbia?  or Harvard?  Is that why his college records are sealed?  Who funded his education?  </p>
<p>How did he &#8220;earn&#8221; his wealth?  He worked as a community organizer.  Last I checked that is not a high paying job.  Looks suspicious to me.</p>
<p>Mr. Obama has not WORKED for a living and is out of touch with the average American worker.  Wake up America &#8211; Barack Obama will do nothing for you except tax the working people to help the lazy folks get their large screen TVs, fancy cars, and houses they can&#8217;t afford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama style Halloween by Truth Teller</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/obama-halloween/obama-style-halloween/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth Teller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=118#comment-9</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re incorrect JD. 

While it&#039;s true democrats like Barney Frank were working towards making it easier for lower income families to get affordable home loans, it&#039;s the predatory lending that got us into this mess. In other words, they &quot;tricked&quot; people into getting bigger loans than they could afford knowing they were going to sell that debt (bundled with other bad loans) off to other banks. Then those banks resold it, and again, over and over. It&#039;s like hot potato. Until whoever was left standing with it at the end got screwed. Except not really. They just walked away with the money while people lost their homes. 

And let me tell you something, when you say that&#039;s not racist, you are implying that it was poor black people that couldn&#039;t pay their bills. That is not only indicative of racism, it&#039;s also complete ignorance. It wasn&#039;t just black people that got taken in by this. It was everybody.

You&#039;re correct in thinking that I&#039;m partisan. I am a liberal atheist democrat from NC. And absolutely proud of that. But, I get my information from all sources that I can. 

If you think that I don&#039;t know that Dick Morris is a political analyst for FOX News, your the one that is miss-informed. Stop watching the &quot;truly biased media&quot; and start thinking for yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re incorrect JD. </p>
<p>While it&#8217;s true democrats like Barney Frank were working towards making it easier for lower income families to get affordable home loans, it&#8217;s the predatory lending that got us into this mess. In other words, they &#8220;tricked&#8221; people into getting bigger loans than they could afford knowing they were going to sell that debt (bundled with other bad loans) off to other banks. Then those banks resold it, and again, over and over. It&#8217;s like hot potato. Until whoever was left standing with it at the end got screwed. Except not really. They just walked away with the money while people lost their homes. </p>
<p>And let me tell you something, when you say that&#8217;s not racist, you are implying that it was poor black people that couldn&#8217;t pay their bills. That is not only indicative of racism, it&#8217;s also complete ignorance. It wasn&#8217;t just black people that got taken in by this. It was everybody.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re correct in thinking that I&#8217;m partisan. I am a liberal atheist democrat from NC. And absolutely proud of that. But, I get my information from all sources that I can. </p>
<p>If you think that I don&#8217;t know that Dick Morris is a political analyst for FOX News, your the one that is miss-informed. Stop watching the &#8220;truly biased media&#8221; and start thinking for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama style Halloween by Josh Duffy</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/obama-halloween/obama-style-halloween/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Duffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=118#comment-8</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re incorrect TT.  The democrats are blaming the republicans for the crisis because they wanted deregulation.  However, it&#039;s really the fault of both parties.

The republicans wanted deregulation of Fanny and Freddy.  The democrats passed regulation forcing lenders to loan money to people who couldn&#039;t possibly pay it back (to be fair and not racist).  The result of these two ideals colliding is the crisis we have now.

For you to blame this on republicans is to show that you&#039;re purely partisan and not an independent thinker.  Quit paying attention to biased media outlets and either do the research yourself or consult with unbiased experts.  

One good source is Dick Morris.  He&#039;s not a republican (he actually worked for Bill Clinton&#039;s administration as a close adviser).  Morris is respected by both the left and the right.  See what he has to say about economic issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re incorrect TT.  The democrats are blaming the republicans for the crisis because they wanted deregulation.  However, it&#8217;s really the fault of both parties.</p>
<p>The republicans wanted deregulation of Fanny and Freddy.  The democrats passed regulation forcing lenders to loan money to people who couldn&#8217;t possibly pay it back (to be fair and not racist).  The result of these two ideals colliding is the crisis we have now.</p>
<p>For you to blame this on republicans is to show that you&#8217;re purely partisan and not an independent thinker.  Quit paying attention to biased media outlets and either do the research yourself or consult with unbiased experts.  </p>
<p>One good source is Dick Morris.  He&#8217;s not a republican (he actually worked for Bill Clinton&#8217;s administration as a close adviser).  Morris is respected by both the left and the right.  See what he has to say about economic issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama style Halloween by Truth Teller</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/obama-halloween/obama-style-halloween/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth Teller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=118#comment-7</guid>
		<description>You are absolutely correct. I should have worded that better. The point I was trying to get across is this; The deregulation of the banking industry was pushed by the right. They created a breeding ground for corruption in high level trading of mortgage backed securities. 

Also, I shouldn&#039;t have thrown in the &quot;you idiots&quot; part. I was wrong for stating it that way. That kind of mentality does nothing to help the divisive nature of our country at the moment or bring people together. I was guilty of the same ignorance that I was trying to condemn. So for that statement, I apologize. 

We all need to do everything we can to spread the truth and focus on the areas that we agree instead of harping about the ways we differ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are absolutely correct. I should have worded that better. The point I was trying to get across is this; The deregulation of the banking industry was pushed by the right. They created a breeding ground for corruption in high level trading of mortgage backed securities. </p>
<p>Also, I shouldn&#8217;t have thrown in the &#8220;you idiots&#8221; part. I was wrong for stating it that way. That kind of mentality does nothing to help the divisive nature of our country at the moment or bring people together. I was guilty of the same ignorance that I was trying to condemn. So for that statement, I apologize. </p>
<p>We all need to do everything we can to spread the truth and focus on the areas that we agree instead of harping about the ways we differ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama style Halloween by Ray Milward</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/obama-halloween/obama-style-halloween/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Milward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=118#comment-6</guid>
		<description>@TT

Just so you know, we have a democratic majority in both the House of Representatives as well as in the Senate.  The republicans in congress can&#039;t do anything if the democrats don&#039;t let them.  The bill didn&#039;t pass the first time, and almost didn&#039;t pass the second time.  The republicans were mostly against it.  The democrats were mostly for it.

Before you go off saying I&#039;m just some right wing idiot, let me point out that I&#039;m a lifelong democrat.  We only have our own party in congress to blame for the bailout</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@TT</p>
<p>Just so you know, we have a democratic majority in both the House of Representatives as well as in the Senate.  The republicans in congress can&#8217;t do anything if the democrats don&#8217;t let them.  The bill didn&#8217;t pass the first time, and almost didn&#8217;t pass the second time.  The republicans were mostly against it.  The democrats were mostly for it.</p>
<p>Before you go off saying I&#8217;m just some right wing idiot, let me point out that I&#8217;m a lifelong democrat.  We only have our own party in congress to blame for the bailout</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Infomercial by Dan Schell</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/obama-infomercial/obama-infomercial/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Schell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=124#comment-5</guid>
		<description>@Mark

You hit the nail on the head.  He&#039;s just taking advantage of our donations.  He&#039;s collected 600 million dollars for things like this?  With that kind of money he should be blowing McCain away, not have a small lead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mark</p>
<p>You hit the nail on the head.  He&#8217;s just taking advantage of our donations.  He&#8217;s collected 600 million dollars for things like this?  With that kind of money he should be blowing McCain away, not have a small lead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Infomercial by Mark Israel</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/obama-infomercial/obama-infomercial/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Israel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=124#comment-4</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what I don&#039;t understand.  People keep saying that this is capitalism.  It&#039;s been a while since I&#039;ve taken an economics class, but I&#039;m pretty sure you need an actual product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what I don&#8217;t understand.  People keep saying that this is capitalism.  It&#8217;s been a while since I&#8217;ve taken an economics class, but I&#8217;m pretty sure you need an actual product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama style Halloween by Truth Teller</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/obama-halloween/obama-style-halloween/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth Teller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=118#comment-3</guid>
		<description>This is just another example of republicans choosing to hear what they want. There is nothing like being ignorant and spreading that around. Luckily, you idiots are going to lose this one, and the U.S. (not to mention the entire world) will be so much better off for it! 

P.S. If your going to be pissed at &quot;spreading the wealth around&quot;, why don&#039;t you start with 700 billion that just got yanked from our pockets and given to the &quot;poor&quot; banking industry. Thanks for that GOP!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just another example of republicans choosing to hear what they want. There is nothing like being ignorant and spreading that around. Luckily, you idiots are going to lose this one, and the U.S. (not to mention the entire world) will be so much better off for it! </p>
<p>P.S. If your going to be pissed at &#8220;spreading the wealth around&#8221;, why don&#8217;t you start with 700 billion that just got yanked from our pockets and given to the &#8220;poor&#8221; banking industry. Thanks for that GOP!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama style Halloween by Joe the Trick or Treater</title>
		<link>http://votingtruth.com/obama-halloween/obama-style-halloween/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe the Trick or Treater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://votingtruth.com/?p=118#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I have a child who is hoping to one day have over 100 pieces of candy. Does that 
mean that you will give him less?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a child who is hoping to one day have over 100 pieces of candy. Does that<br />
mean that you will give him less?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

